User description

WebhardCompared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud should be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible. File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned).Webhard It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only has to be in a folder.You have to share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like an area drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)It has a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. And when it's in that state, you have to discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)Google DriveIt exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.It is easy to connect with other Google services such as for example Gmail.Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not account for cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite). Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.There are the most apps that can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. 웹하드 순위 It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.If you use Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, but it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)DropboxIt exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world when it comes to media reading.There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB. The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...There exists a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents.Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents. The dropbox itself can't be documented.There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely. In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.Slow. Not paid people. Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported. If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it's much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***SkydriveThe writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.